1973 Volvo 1800 vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Volvo 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Volvo 1800 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP @ 2000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1973 Volvo 1800. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1973 Volvo 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 410 kg more than 1973 Volvo 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Volvo 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Volvo 1800. (154 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Volvo 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Volvo 1800 | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Volvo | Nissan |
Model | 1800 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1973 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Torque | 154 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1600 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2540 mm |