1973 Zastava 1300 vs. 1967 AC Cobra
To start off, 1973 Zastava 1300 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 AC Cobra (410 HP) has 357 more horse power than 1973 Zastava 1300. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1973 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 AC Cobra weights approximately 163 kg more than 1973 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 AC Cobra (651 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 558 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1967 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Zastava 1300 | 1967 AC Cobra | |
Make | Zastava | AC |
Model | 1300 | Cobra |
Year Released | 1973 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 6997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 410 HP |
Torque | 93 Nm | 651 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1147 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2290 mm |