1973 Zastava 1300 vs. 2012 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 408 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 408 (110 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1973 Zastava 1300. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1973 Zastava 1300.
Because 1973 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Peugeot 408 (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Peugeot 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Zastava 1300 | 2012 Peugeot 408 | |
| Make | Zastava | Peugeot |
| Model | 1300 | 408 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1815 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1525 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2710 mm |
