1974 Abarth A 112 vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 1974 Abarth A 112 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1974 Abarth A 112.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Abarth A 112 | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | 60 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1942 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 5671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3230 mm |
