1974 Abarth A 112 vs. 1952 Austin A 40
To start off, 1974 Abarth A 112 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1974 Abarth A 112.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Abarth A 112 | 1952 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | A 112 | A 40 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 1049 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2360 mm |