1974 Abarth A 112 vs. 1968 Toyota 2000GT
To start off, 1974 Abarth A 112 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota 2000GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota 2000GT would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Toyota 2000GT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Toyota 2000GT weights approximately 440 kg more than 1974 Abarth A 112.
Because 1968 Toyota 2000GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Toyota 2000GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Abarth A 112 | 1968 Toyota 2000GT | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | A 112 | 2000GT |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2340 mm |
