1974 Abarth A 112 vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 2,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 866 kg more than 1974 Abarth A 112.
Because 1996 Mazda Sentia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda Sentia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mazda Sentia has automatic transmission and 1974 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1974 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mazda Sentia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Abarth A 112 | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | A 112 | Sentia |
Year Released | 1974 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 1049 cc | 2954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1566 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2860 mm |