1974 Abarth A 112 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 935 kg more than 1974 Abarth A 112.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Abarth A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1974 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1974 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Abarth A 112 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 1049 cc | 3599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 263 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2890 mm |
