1974 Abarth A 112 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1215 kg more than 1974 Abarth A 112.
Because 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Abarth A 112 | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1049 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 556 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2880 mm |
