1974 Abarth A 112 vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1470 kg more than 1974 Abarth A 112.
Because 2010 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Abarth A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1974 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1974 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Abarth A 112 | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | A 112 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1974 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1885 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2789 mm |