1974 AC 428 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 AC 428. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 AC 428 would be higher. At 7,003 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 AC 428 (298 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 AC 428 should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1974 AC 428 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 AC 428. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 AC 428 (639 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 466 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1974 AC 428 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1974 AC 428 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | 428 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7003 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 298 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 639 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2601 mm |