1974 Alfa Romeo 2000 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Alfa Romeo 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Alfa Romeo 2000 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Alfa Romeo 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 63 kg more than 1974 Alfa Romeo 2000.
Because 1974 Alfa Romeo 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Alfa Romeo 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Alfa Romeo 2000 (176 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (148 Nm). This means 1974 Alfa Romeo 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Alfa Romeo 2000 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
Model | 2000 | Clio |
Year Released | 1974 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 148 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 80.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1007 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2480 mm |