1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | Giulia | 62 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 79 L |