1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (101 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 610 kg more than 1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (190 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia. 2003 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia has manual transmission. 1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1974 Alfa Romeo Giulia 2003 Cadillac CTS
Make Alfa Romeo Cadillac
Model Giulia CTS
Year Released 1974 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1288 cc 2597 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 101 HP 179 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 190 Nm 245 Nm
Engine Bore Size 74 mm 83.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75 mm 79.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.2:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1010 kg 1620 kg
Vehicle Length 4190 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1570 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2460 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 46 L 64 L