1974 Alpina 2002 vs. 1968 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1974 Alpina 2002 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1200 kg more than 1974 Alpina 2002.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Alpina 2002 | 1968 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Alpina | Cadillac |
Model | 2002 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1974 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 229 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3390 mm |