1974 Alpina 2002 vs. 1968 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1974 Alpina 2002 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Alpina 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Alpina 2002 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1968 Triumph Spitfire.
Because 1974 Alpina 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Alpina 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Triumph Spitfire, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Alpina 2002 | 1968 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Alpina | Triumph |
Model | 2002 | Spitfire |
Year Released | 1974 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2110 mm |