1974 Alpina 2002 vs. 1989 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1989 Holden Apollo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Alpina 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Alpina 2002 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Holden Apollo weights approximately 225 kg more than 1974 Alpina 2002.
Because 1974 Alpina 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Alpina 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Alpina 2002 | 1989 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Alpina | Holden |
Model | 2002 | Apollo |
Year Released | 1974 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2610 mm |