1974 Alpina 2002 vs. 2005 Ford Puma
To start off, 2005 Ford Puma is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Alpina 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Alpina 2002 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Alpina 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Puma weights approximately 55 kg more than 1974 Alpina 2002.
Because 1974 Alpina 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Alpina 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Alpina 2002 | 2005 Ford Puma | |
Make | Alpina | Ford |
Model | 2002 | Puma |
Year Released | 1974 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2450 mm |