1974 Alpina 2002 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Alpina 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Alpina 2002 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 798 kg more than 1974 Alpina 2002.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Alpina 2002 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Alpina | Cadillac |
| Model | 2002 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 318 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1778 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2880 mm |
