1974 Alpina 3 vs. 1997 Ford Puma
To start off, 1997 Ford Puma is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Alpina 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Alpina 3 would be higher. At 2,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Alpina 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Alpina 3 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1997 Ford Puma.
Because 1974 Alpina 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Alpina 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Alpina 3 | 1997 Ford Puma | |
Make | Alpina | Ford |
Model | 3 | Puma |
Year Released | 1974 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 1679 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2450 mm |