1974 Alpina 3 vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Alpina 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Alpina 3 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1974 Alpina 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Alpina 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Alpina 3 | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
| Make | Alpina | Holden |
| Model | 3 | Maloo |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2985 cc | 5699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
