1974 Alpina 3 vs. 2002 Cadillac Seville
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Seville is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Alpina 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Alpina 3 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 604 kg more than 1974 Alpina 3.
Because 1974 Alpina 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Alpina 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Alpina 3 | 2002 Cadillac Seville | |
Make | Alpina | Cadillac |
Model | 3 | Seville |
Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 4572 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1804 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2890 mm |