1974 Alpina 3 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Alpina 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Alpina 3 would be higher. At 2,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Alpina 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1974 Alpina 3.
Because 1974 Alpina 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Alpina 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Alpina 3 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Alpina | Mazda |
Model | 3 | 3 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |