1974 Alpina 3 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Alpina 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Alpina 3 would be higher. At 2,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Alpina 3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1974 Alpina 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Alpina 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Alpina 3 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Alpina | Holden |
Model | 3 | Epica |
Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |