1974 Alpina 3 vs. 2012 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Alpina 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Alpina 3 would be higher. At 2,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Alpina 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Alpina 3 weights approximately 133 kg more than 2012 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1974 Alpina 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Alpina 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Alpina 3 | 2012 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Alpina | Volkswagen |
| Model | 3 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2985 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1067 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1682 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1462 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2470 mm |
