1974 Alpine A 310 vs. 1971 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1974 Alpine A 310 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Alpine A 310 (127 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1971 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 1971 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1974 Alpine A 310.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Alpine A 310 (146 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Triumph 2000. (136 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1974 Alpine A 310 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Alpine A 310 | 1971 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Alpine | Triumph |
Model | A 310 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1605 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2700 mm |