1974 Alpine A 310 vs. 1977 Zastava 132
To start off, 1977 Zastava 132 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Alpine A 310 (127 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1977 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 1977 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Zastava 132 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1974 Alpine A 310.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Alpine A 310 (146 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1974 Alpine A 310 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Alpine A 310 | 1977 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Alpine | Zastava |
Model | A 310 | 132 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1977 |
Engine Size | 1605 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2560 mm |