1974 Alpine A 310 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 1,605 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Alpine A 310 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Alpine A 310 (127 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Alpine A 310 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Alpine A 310 (146 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1974 Alpine A 310 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Alpine A 310 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Alpine | Zastava |
| Model | A 310 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1605 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2160 mm |
