1974 Alpine A 310 vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1974 Alpine A 310. (127 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1974 Alpine A 310. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 383 kg more than 1974 Alpine A 310. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Alpine A 310. (146 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Alpine A 310. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1974 Alpine A 310 has manual transmission. 1974 Alpine A 310 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Alpine A 310 | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Alpine | Ford |
| Model | A 310 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1605 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 3260 mm |
