1974 AMC Matador vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1974 AMC Matador is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 AMC Matador (220 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 AMC Matador weights approximately 622 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 AMC Matador (427 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1974 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1974 AMC Matador | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | AMC | Triumph |
Model | Matador | 2000 |
Year Released | 1974 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5896 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 103.6 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1792 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 92 L | 64 L |