1974 AMC Matador vs. 2000 Lada Tarzan
To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 AMC Matador would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 AMC Matador (220 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 AMC Matador weights approximately 747 kg more than 2000 Lada Tarzan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 AMC Matador. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 AMC Matador (427 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 1974 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
1974 AMC Matador | 2000 Lada Tarzan | |
Make | AMC | Lada |
Model | Matador | Tarzan |
Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5896 cc | 1499 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 77 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 117 Nm |
Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1792 kg | 1045 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2500 mm |