1974 AMC Matador vs. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 AMC Matador would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 AMC Matador (220 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (172 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1974 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 213 kg more than 1974 AMC Matador.
Because 1974 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 AMC Matador | 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
Make | AMC | Chrysler |
Model | Matador | Grand Voyager |
Year Released | 1974 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5896 cc | 3300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 172 HP |
Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 179 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1792 kg | 2005 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 92 L | 75 L |