1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage (321 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (115 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage weights approximately 1056 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Aston Martin | Lotus |
Model | AM Vantage | Elan |
Year Released | 1974 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 1557 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 696 kg |