1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage vs. 2002 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage (321 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2002 Cadillac CTS. (220 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage should accelerate faster than 2002 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage weights approximately 134 kg more than 2002 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage | 2002 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
| Model | AM Vantage | CTS |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3995 cc | 3173 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1618 kg |
