1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage (321 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (177 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage weights approximately 647 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage | 2003 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Renault |
| Model | AM Vantage | Clio |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3995 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1105 kg |
