1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage (321 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (108 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage weights approximately 647 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Aston Martin AM Vantage | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Aston Martin | Renault |
Model | AM Vantage | Clio |
Year Released | 1974 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1105 kg |