1974 Aston Martin Lagonda vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1974 Aston Martin Lagonda is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 5,341 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Aston Martin Lagonda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Aston Martin Lagonda weights approximately 1086 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1974 Aston Martin Lagonda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Aston Martin Lagonda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Aston Martin Lagonda | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mitsubishi |
Model | Lagonda | Colt |
Year Released | 1974 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5341 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 72 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1996 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2360 mm |