1974 Austin 1800 vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 1974 Austin 1800 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Austin 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Austin 1800 (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Austin 1800 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Austin 1800 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Austin 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Austin 1800 | 1962 DKW Munga | |
Make | Austin | DKW |
Model | 1800 | Munga |
Year Released | 1974 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 31 L |