1974 Austin 1800 vs. 1976 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1976 Rolls-Royce Corniche is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1096 kg more than 1974 Austin 1800.
Because 1976 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Austin 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Austin 1800 | 1976 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Austin | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 1800 | Corniche |
Year Released | 1974 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 2286 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3030 mm |