1974 Austin 1800 vs. 2002 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2002 Mahindra CL is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Austin 1800 (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1974 Austin 1800 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra CL weights approximately 110 kg more than 1974 Austin 1800.
Because 2002 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Austin 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Austin 1800. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Austin 1800 | 2002 Mahindra CL | |
Make | Austin | Mahindra |
Model | 1800 | CL |
Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2040 mm |