1974 Austin 1800 vs. 2005 Spyker C8
To start off, 2005 Spyker C8 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2005 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Spyker C8 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1974 Austin 1800.
Because 2005 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Austin 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Austin 1800 | 2005 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Austin | Spyker |
Model | 1800 | C8 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3999 cc |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 100 L |