1974 Austin 1800 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Austin 1800 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Austin 1800 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Austin 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Austin 1800 | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1800 | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1974 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3678 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1585 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |