1974 Austin Allegro vs. 1978 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1978 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1974 Austin Allegro.
Because 1978 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Austin Allegro | 1978 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Allegro | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5032 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3090 mm |
