1974 Austin Allegro vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1974 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1974 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Austin Allegro weights approximately 45 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1983 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Austin Allegro | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Austin | Zastava |
| Model | Allegro | 102 |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2160 mm |
