1974 Austin Marina vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Austin Marina would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Austin Marina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1974 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1974 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 328 kg more than 1974 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Austin Marina. (102 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Austin Marina. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1974 Austin Marina has manual transmission. 1974 Austin Marina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Austin Marina | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | Marina | Equator |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3260 mm |
