1974 Austin Maxi vs. 2002 BMW M3
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 375 more horse power than 1974 Austin Maxi. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1974 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1974 Austin Maxi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Austin Maxi. (104 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Austin Maxi | 2002 BMW M3 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | Maxi | M3 |
Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1485 cc | 3997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 444 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 480 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2890 mm |