1974 Austin Maxi vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1974 Austin Maxi. (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1974 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 305 kg more than 1974 Austin Maxi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Austin Maxi. (104 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Austin Maxi | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Maxi | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1974 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1485 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |