1974 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1962 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1974 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1460 kg more than 1974 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1962 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 519 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Autobianchi A 112. (63 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Autobianchi A 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Autobianchi A 112 | 1962 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1974 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 902 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 2135 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 75 L |
