1974 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1974 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1974 Autobianchi A 112. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1974 Autobianchi A 112. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Autobianchi A 112 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1974 Autobianchi A 112 | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Autobianchi | Lotus |
Model | A 112 | Elan |
Year Released | 1974 | 1968 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 902 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 45 L |