1974 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 2,986 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 1037 kg more than 1974 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Autobianchi A 112. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Autobianchi A 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 1974 Autobianchi A 112 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Toyota |
| Model | A 112 | Condor |
| Year Released | 1974 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 902 cc | 2986 cc |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1712 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 70 L |
